首页> 外文OA文献 >Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure
【2h】

Airborne particles in indoor environment of homes, schools, offices and aged care facilities: The main routes of exposure

机译:家庭,学校,办公室和老年护理设施的室内环境中的空气传播颗粒:主要暴露途径

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been shown that the exposure to airborne particulate matter is one of the most significant environmental risks people face. Since indoor environment is where people spend the majority of time, in order to protect against this risk, the origin of the particles needs to be understood: do they come from indoor, outdoor sources or both? Further, this question needs to be answered separately for each of the PM mass/number size fractions, as they originate from different sources. Numerous studies have been conducted for specific indoor environments or under specific setting. Here our aim was to go beyond the specifics of individual studies, and to explore, based on pooled data from the literature, whether there are generalizable trends in routes of exposure at homes, schools and day cares, offices and aged care facilities. To do this, we quantified the overall 24h and occupancy weighted means of PM10, PM2.5 and PN - particle number concentration. Based on this, we developed a summary of the indoor versus outdoor origin of indoor particles and compared the means to the WHO guidelines (for PM10 and PM2.5) and to the typical levels reported for urban environments (PN). We showed that the main origins of particle metrics differ from one type of indoor environment to another. For homes, outdoor air is the main origin of PM10 and PM2.5 but PN originate from indoor sources; for schools and day cares, outdoor air is the source of PN while PM10 and PM2.5 have indoor sources; and for offices, outdoor air is the source of all three particle size fractions. While each individual building is different, leading to differences in exposure and ideally necessitating its own assessment (which is very rarely done), our findings point to the existence of generalizable trends for the main types of indoor environments where people spend time, and therefore to the type of prevention measures which need to be considered in general for these environments.
机译:已经表明,暴露于空气中的颗粒物是人们面临的最重大的环境风险之一。由于室内环境是人们度过大部分时间的地方,因此为了防止这种风险,需要了解粒子的来源:它们是来自室内,室外还是两者都来?此外,由于每个PM质量数/数大小分数均来自不同来源,因此需要分别回答该问题。已经针对特定的室内环境或在特定的环境下进行了大量研究。在这里,我们的目标是超越个别研究的具体内容,并基于文献汇总数据探讨在家庭,学校和日托,办公室和老年护理机构中接触途径是否存在普遍趋势。为此,我们量化了PM10,PM2.5和PN-粒子数浓度的整体24小时和占用加权平均值。在此基础上,我们总结了室内颗粒与室外颗粒的室内和室外起源,并将该方法与WHO指南(针对PM10和PM2.5)以及报告给城市环境(PN)的典型水平进行了比较。我们表明,粒子度量的主要来源因一种室内环境而异。对于家庭,室外空气是PM10和PM2.5的主要来源,而PN则来自室内。对于学校和日托而言,室外空气是PN的来源,而PM10和PM2.5则是室内的源。对于办公室来说,室外空气是所有这三个粒径部分的来源。尽管每栋建筑物各不相同,导致暴露程度有所差异,并且理想情况下需要进行自己的评估(这很少进行),但我们的发现指出,人们花费时间的主要室内环境存在普遍的趋势,因此这些环境中通常需要考虑的预防措施的类型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号